The Problem of Immigration

I wrote the following on November 26, 2018.  The United States had just tear gassed refugees and immigrants crossing our border.

I honestly can’t stomach this anymore.

We kidnapped children from families coming to us for help.  And, while there was some outrage, there were those who said it was the families’ fault.  It wasn’t.  They came for help.  They were met with the most horrible thing you can do to any parent.

Now we’re tear gassing people.  This was outlawed in 1993, because it’s an inhumane weapon that doesn’t discriminate between intended targets and bystanders… or children.

I have seen people laughing about this. I had to drop a thread altogether because there were people blaming the parents who were fleeing for their lives, and they honestly thought my outrage was funny.  It isn’t.

The argument is that they can come, but they must do it legally.  The legal argument is an effort to give cover to the fact that what we are doing is patently immoral.  It was illegal to help a slave escape in 1850.  But it was the right thing to do.  Slavery was legal, but it was wrong.  It was illegal to hide Anne Frank in your attic in 1939.  But it was the right thing to do.  Nazism was legal, but it was wrong.  It is, in some states, illegal to feed homeless people.  But it’s the right thing to do.  Preventing people from helping others is legal, but it’s wrong.

There are many laws that are good laws because they protect us.  It’s illegal to kill me, or to steal my car, or to rape someone.  I’m in favor of those laws.  They protect us.

I don’t need to be protected from a family crossing a line.  They pose no threat to me.  If they come in and hurt someone, by all means, stop them. But crossing that line hurts no one.  And to greet people who come for help with tear gas instead of with open arms is the height of immorality.

I don’t want to hear that we don’t have the resources to help them. Of course we do. To believe otherwise is to buy into the oligarchy’s plan to make us fight with each other over the scraps of food they drop on the floor, while they pile up cash in offshore accounts and laugh at us.  The refugees, the poor, those who need help are not a threat to you.  They are not the ones keeping you from a good life.  That would be the ones with the power.  And so long as we keep supporting them, they will keep suffocating us.

What we are doing at our border is wrong.  To believe otherwise is to delude yourself.

What will I do?  I’m doing it.  I’m speaking out as loudly as I can.  “But, if you’re so worried about them, why don’t you let them come and live with you?” If your house is on fire, I can’t put it out.  I pay taxes, though, so someone can.  If you need to get to work, I can’t build you a road.  I pay taxes, though, so someone can.  If you are being attacked, I can’t help you.  But I pay taxes so someone can.

If people need help, and I am in a position to give it to them, I will. I just offered someone our extra room if she needs it because it’s all I can do.  I don’t have a single dollar to my name today.  But what I have is a voice. What I have is a talent for writing.  Those are what I have to offer.  The Little Drummer Boy could play.  I can write.  We give what we have to help those who need it. We don’t attack those in trouble.

I hope you understand.

If you need a reminder of what happened, there are two links in the transcript that will take you through the details.  One if from the BBC.  The other is from NPR.  These are traditionally two of the most objective media outlets.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46355258

https://www.npr.org/2018/11/25/670687806/u-s-agents-spray-tear-gas-at-migrants-briefly-close-tijuana-border-entry

Last week I talked a little about Legalism, or the idea that adherence to a strict set of laws or religious beliefs is the way to define moral behavior.  I find it to be an excuse for doing what we know is wrong.  The argument that they can come, but they must do so legally, is a textbook example of the moral cowardice of Legalism. 

We need to stop seeing laws and start seeing people.  These are human beings coming for help.  They are often hungry and homeless.  They have been threatened by drug cartels.  They have been victims of violence.  And our response is that they have to wait until they have filled out the proper paperwork and had it stamped by the appropriate authorities?  That’s simply wrong.  They could be your parents.  They could be your children.  They share most of their attributes.  And we should care about them as we care about our own families… because they are part of our family. 

I spent last night reading comments from a supposed economist who was extolling the genius of Thomas Sowell and Adam Smith to explain why our Capitalist economy is the best of all possible worlds.  It’s just an unfortunate side effect that this economy is filled with people trying their best to make ends meet.  They work 2 or 3 jobs just to pay rent, but, by all means, let the markets regulate themselves.  There are hundreds of thousands of homeless people sleeping on the streets and shivering in the cold, but that’s just sort of too bad, because if we tried anything else, it would certainly be worse. 

I won’t accept such arguments.  I will be the first to admit that I am nothing resembling an economist.  I know next to nothing about how economies work.  I don’t know the science.  All I can see are the results.  And the results of our economic system are appalling.

We need to stop seeing numbers and start seeing people.  When children don’t have a warm bed, the economy isn’t working.  When children are put into cages, the immigration system isn’t working. 

In simplest terms, people matter more than money.  People matter more than arbitrary laws that keep them from the help they need.

Part of the problem, I think, is that we have global markets, but we lack any global government to regulate them.  This allows corporations to wield enormous power without anything to stop them.  If one country taxes them, they simply move their money to another.  If one country forces them to pay a living wage, they move their jobs to another.  And the exploitation goes on.

We have borders to protect us from others coming to our country and taking advantage of us.  But… what if we had no borders, anywhere, at all?  What if we recognized that there is no Them; we are all Us?  What would this mean?

It would mean an effective one-world government that benefits everyone.  If we had a global democracy, we could distribute global resources to where they are most needed without dealing with borders that keep help from getting where it is most needed.

Democracy comes from the Greek terms “Demos,” meaning “people,” and “Kratia,” or power.  It is the idea that people have the power to rule themselves.  We’ve been trying to get Democracy right for more than 2,500 years, and we still haven’t managed it.  I believe this is because governments are subject to the will of other governments, and they must compete with one another for supremacy.  Authoritarian dictatorships frequently create stronger militaries, and Democracy can’t fight them effectively.

Instead of fighting each other for control of what Carl Sagan aptly described as a “fraction of a dot,” we should work toward having a global democracy that works for all of us instead of giving all the advantages to the wealthy. 

This is not what The United Nations does now.  That’s a collection of governments, and participation is entirely voluntary.  The UN has no power to enforce its policies.  It has little voice in governments who exploit or oppress their own citizens.  Its function is mostly symbolic.

I don’t have details for you about how to accomplish this.  I’m sorry.  I’m not nearly intelligent enough to design such a government.  But I can give you some ideas that would help to shape it. 

Its purpose must be to help all people.  Its representatives should be elected by popular vote.  Everyone needs to be allowed to vote without interference or coercion.   It should ensure that all people get the healthcare they need.  It should ensure that education is freely available.  It should see to it that everyone has a warm bed and decent food to eat.  A government of any kind that does less is a failure to the extent that it falls short of these goals. 

I leave it to better minds than mine to work out the details.  And better minds than mine will become increasingly common as education becomes more readily available. 

So, how do we solve The Problem of Immigration?  We remove all the borders that separate one country from another, and we become one planet composed of one people.  We recognize that we are all travelers on this rock tumbling through space.  We work together to better ourselves and the rest of humanity instead of trying to create stacks of bits of green linen and cotton that, themselves, are becoming less and less common.  We use currency less frequently all the time, and now we are transferring most of our money electronically.  There are more and more places that decline to accept cash.  I had thought this was illegal, but the federal reserve tells us it’s not.

There is no federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law that says otherwise.

Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled “Legal tender,” states: “United States coins and currency [including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve Banks and national banks] are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues.” This statute means that all U.S. money as identified above is a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12772.htm

This means it’s more difficult for people who don’t have bank accounts to get any help.  If I give a homeless person a ten-dollar-bill, they can’t necessarily take it to a coffee shop to get something to eat anymore.  Currency is losing its value.  The world is becoming much more for those who have, and much less for those who have not.

We need to stop making decisions about people based on their place of birth, their gender, their race, the color of their skin, or their sexuality, and instead we see that there is much more that unites us than divides us.  We must recognize that everyone is someone’s son or daughter, just as you and I are, and that hurting them means making miserable not only them but the people who love them.  We see every child as we would see our own children, and we grant them the love they have earned simply by showing up on Earth. 

Hatred has reigned long enough on Earth.  Why not try Love for a while?  Let’s see how that works out.

One Planet, One People… Please? 2022

Carl Sagan warned us about Mutually Assured Destruction 40 years ago.  If we do survive a nuclear war, the condition of our planet will be such that any life afterward will be miserable.  We humans have spent trillions of dollars in an effort to learn to kill each other more effectively, quickly, efficiently, cheaply, and remotely.  We have a massive war industry.  And War is the polite term for mass murder. 

Already in Ukraine, as of March 17, 2022, more than 100 children have been killed as a result of Putin’s attacks.  Children.  They have done nothing to deserve death.  They are children.  This is sickening.  This is immoral.  This is wrong in every possible way.  It is unforgivable.  There is no defense for this state of affairs.

Yes, there is!  They are the enemy.  The enemy needs to be killed.  That’s the way the world works. 

Perhaps it is.  But it shouldn’t be. 

There are certain undeniable truths that we need to understand.  One is that there is no Them; we are all Us.  Everyone who dies in a war is someone’s son or daughter.  They are people just like you and me.  They may have different ideas.  They may have different beliefs.  They may have very different lives.  But they are human beings who are here for an incredibly brief time, and we have shortened it by killing them.  We can make up reasons to decide it doesn’t matter when someone dies, but it still does.  We don’t feel the deaths of strangers as deeply as those close to us.  We shouldn’t.  If I felt every death as deeply as I did the demise of my Dad or my Dog, I would spend all my time curled up crying in a fetal position.  That doesn’t mean the deaths don’t matter.  Of course they do.  And nearly everyone who dies has someone who feels the death as painfully as I felt the loss of Melanie. 

The second fact about which there can be no debate, is that we are all living on the same planet at the same time. 

More than 40 years ago, when I was an adolescent running around in as much of a hormone haze as I now am surrounded by the Fog of Idealism, I was as madly in love as a boy could be with a girl whose intellect and compassion I admired nearly as much as her physical form.  When you’re 16, it’s difficult to see much beyond appearance.  Or, at least it was for me.  Perhaps today’s adolescents are more enlightened than I was.

Among the reasons I fell in love with her was her Idealism was seductively attractive to me.  She was a member of a religion of which I had never heard, called Baha’i.  I had, even then, no supernatural beliefs, but I loved the idea of unity that was at the core of her religious beliefs.  She had on her car a bumper sticker that has the unique status of actually affecting me.  It said, “One Planet, One People… Please?”  I have never forgotten the words.  Now, I believe, she’s off living with her husband on a farm somewhere, and we say hello to each other occasionally on Facebook, but we don’t really have a serious friendship anymore.  Her influence over my thinking, however, has only grown in the intervening decades. 

She was the water and sunlight that made the seed planted a decade earlier grow and flourish.  What planted the seed?  It was Star Trek, of course.  In Star Trek, we are all one people sharing one planet, and we’re not only working together as humans, but we are also working with species from other worlds.  We spend our time trying to better ourselves and the rest of humanity.  It is cooperation and exploration at its best. 

I believe if we could all embrace the idea that we are all deserving of life, that all of us matter, that there is more we share than there is that separates us, we might find wars would stop. 

There is much debate right now about what the United States, and/or NATO should do about the Russian Invasion of Ukraine.  I wish that I were wise enough to tell them what to do, but I honestly don’t know.  I have no knowledge of military tactics.  I have no expertise in winning a war.  Should we use our military to stop Russia?  I don’t know.  If we do, will this lead us to World War III?  Will it lead to a nuclear holocaust that could destroy most of the species, and leave behind a cold and barren horror story in which to live?  I have no idea. 

What I do know is that people are being murdered on a massive scale.  I know that to be true of every war ever fought by anyone on this planet at any time in history.  I know that it will be true of every war we fight in the future.  We count the value of war by determining the number of lives saved against the number of lives extinguished.  If the United States hadn’t bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, how many lives would have been lost in the continuation of the war?  Had Japan or Germany won the war, how much more horrible would the world be than it is now?  I don’t know.  I can’t know.  I’m not Q.  I have no power to view alternative time lines.  I can guess.  I can speculate.  So can you.  So can people much smarter than we are.  No one, however, can know.

What can we know?  We can verify that nearly 200,000 people were killed by the atomic bomb.  How many people is that?  To put it in a personal perspective, I have nearly 2,000 friends on Facebook.  There may be 20 or 30 I’ve actually met.  So… everyone I know would be 1% of the loss caused by the atomic bomb.  Assume I’ve met at least 2,000 people in person over my 59 years in wandering this planet.  That brings me to 4,000 people.  Fifty times that many died because we used atomic bombs.  That’s more than enough to leave me utterly alone in my life, fifty times over.  That would knock me out of human contact for this and, if we get reincarnated, the next 49 lives.  I’m guessing your numbers are different from mine, but not substantially so.  Everyone you have ever known, and everyone you ever will know is almost certainly dwarfed by 200,000 people.  And today’s weapons are infinitely more powerful.  The damage we can do to each other is unimaginable. 

https://www.atomicarchive.com/resources/documents/med/med_chp10.html

Why, God, why do we insist on mass murder?  Why must we be consumed by homicidal hatred instead of united by love?

Arizona’s Governor, Doug Ducey, had this on his Facebook page:

In Arizona, we will secure our border.  With advanced equipment & drone technology, we can bolster surveillance and stop the criminals in their tracks.  Discussed some of these tactics with Palmer Luckey, the founder of Oculus VR and defense-tech company Anduril Industries.

I posted a comment that I thought was fairly obvious:

When someone commits a crime that hurts someone, by all means, arrest them.  No one is hurt by someone crossing the border.  They are human beings.  They deserve the best life they can have.  If they come here, they can, and often do, help us to build a better world.

Don’t waste resources, please, on keeping decent people out of our country.

This set off a firestorm of hatred directed toward me.  I suppose I ought not to have been surprised.  They dragged out the same old arguments:  They have, they told me, nothing against immigrants, but they should come in legally.  That’s a legal argument, not a moral one.  If I were living 200 years ago, I could have owned another human being.  It was legal, but, guess what?  It was immoral.  I don’t think any rational person would argue to the contrary in the 21st Century.  The Law has little to do with Morality.    The process of becoming a citizen takes years, it’s expensive, and, like anything else that involves our government, can be delayed or even shut down due to nothing more than paperwork errors that are no fault of the person applying for citizenship.  All the while, they are trying to pay rent and put food on the table, just like the rest of us are.  And they live under the constant threat that they will be removed from their homes and shipped like so much cargo to another country as though we were returning a defective DVD to Amazon.  Legalism is an excuse for doing what we know to be wrong.  Laws can be changed; this one ought to be. 

I heard about drug cartels and human trafficking.  Yes, those are conditions that exist.  They are evil.  And they have nothing to do with the vast majority of people coming to America in search of a better life.  Statistically, immigrants are less likely to be criminals than those of us who were To The Manor, Born.  If they engage in human trafficking or commit other crimes, we arrest them for those crimes, not for stepping over a line.  There is a Tom Cruise movie in which people are arrested for crimes they’re likely to commit in the future.  It’s an obscene idea.  It suggests that we can’t change our minds.  It’s Orwell’s Thought Police on Steroids.  Could we please wait until someone does something to hurt us before we deny them the liberty about which my students chanted, hands over their hearts, every morning for 29 years?  Is that really an unreasonable request?

Immigrants are fleeing Ukraine as I write this.  Fortunately, there are other countries that will let them in, just as we used to do at Ellis Island.  In the late 19th and early 20th centuries all that was required was a health check.  If you were unable to pass it, you were held in isolation until you were no longer a health risk to the rest of society.  You weren’t constantly living with the threat of deportation.  You could join the Pursuit of Happiness, at least to some small degree. 

There were the arguments concerning the use of our resources by people who were not Us.  More than one terribly clever person suggested I take them in and support them, somehow equating the roughly 1,000 square feet of my condo with the 105.8 trillion square feet that make up the United States.  That argument is too absurd to engage.  In case you haven’t heard me say it 105.8 trillion times yet, there is no Them; we are all Us.

 This is what we need to understand more than anything else.  If we can feel for each other just the slightest bit of empathy, if we can learn to lead with love, we can change the world. 

I’m going to end this episode with the piece that made a friend suggest I start a blog (I didn’t even know what a blog was at the time.  I was just posting my writing on Facebook hoping someone would respond.  It was the fact that my Rhiannon (see The Haunting of Horace for details) reacted that prompted me to keep writing.) that led to this show.  I think it’s relevant now.

Empathy and Art

My earliest memory of feeling empathy is Christmas 1969.  I was 7 years old, sitting under a tree with an obscene number of gifts I had just opened, and feeling truly ecstatic, when I noticed my Mother had no Christmas presents.  Not one.  I burst into tears of guilt.  My father took me to a drug store, and we found Mom a candle, and it was my first present to her.  Neither Dad nor I had any ability to wrap a candle, so we gave it to Mom to wrap.  And when she opened it an hour or so later, she loved that candle as she loved her children.  She got candles from me for decades after that, and for nearly every occasion.  It took several additional hours for me to recognize that Dad hadn’t gotten any presents, either, and Mom took me to the drug store to buy Dad a pipe. I gave him most of the pipes he used to smoke.  These Traditions were the product of Empathy.

I have, and I would guess most of you have, wept for Tom Robinson.  I have cheered for Sherlock Holmes.  I have spoken with Hamlet repeatedly about the value and meaning (or lack thereof) of life.  I have felt joy for Elinor Dashwood and Edward Ferrars.  I learned Friendship from Sam and Frodo, and Kirk, Spock, and McCoy.  I learned courage from Santiago and his marlin, and morality from Atticus Finch.  I have faced George’s agonizing moral dilemma concerning his best friend, Lenny, when George tells him to think about the rabbits.  These are all other examples of Empathy.

I believe Empathy is essential to being Human.  Too much Empathy is dangerous, of course.  You can’t possibly grieve for every tragedy in the world.  No one has that vast an emotional landscape.  But, the inability to feel for others is, in my mind, the root of evil. You don’t kill people not because it’s against the law, but because you can feel for someone besides yourself.  You won’t commit most acts of violence or cruelty for the same reasons.  You can imagine how you would feel if it happened to you.  You can’t do something you believe to be evil because you can experience the emotions of Others.

I believe an exposure to The Arts is essential for increasing a person’s Empathy.  It’s in books, movies, music, paintings, poetry, dance, and other forms of Art that we find our own feelings.  And it’s where we learn to feel the joys and pains that our fellow travelers on this little ball in space are likely to feel, themselves.  It’s in catharsis that we learn the most about ourselves and each other.

When we can understand each other, we can dispense with the idea of Us vs. Them.  We can move forward together, as a species, and this is a product of Empathy.  I care about you because I recognize some of myself in you.  I hope you can see some of yourself in me, too.

Could we please stop killing each other now?

I love you.

American Concentration Camps

U.S. Border Patrol agents conduct intake of illegal border crossers at the Central Processing Center in McAllen, Texas, Sunday, June 17, 2018.

“The United States is running concentration camps on our southern border and that is exactly what they are – they are concentration camps – and if that doesn’t bother you…”

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Right off the top, people are disagreeing. Concentration camps are where the Jews were held by the Nazis during World War II. What we’re doing at the Southern Border doesn’t involve gas chambers pretending to be showers. We’re not murdering six million people. The language is inflammatory. It’s divisive. It’s offensive to Jewish people the world over.

Right… why, exactly, is that?

Frankly, I don’t care if you want to call them Concentration Camps, Detention Centers, Holding Facilities, or Holiday Fucking Inns. The fact is that they exist in The United States. Today. Right now. These aren’t the Japanese Internment Facilities of the past, before most of us were alive. These exist in America today. They are morally wrong.

Well, you liberals want to blame Trump for everything. These were started under Obama, and where was your outrage then? You’re just a Trump Hater.”

Okay. Fair enough. We won’t blame President Trump. You may blame President Obama if you would like. You may blame Hillary Clinton. You may blame Nancy Pelosi. You may blame AOC, Santa Claus, The Tooth Fairy, or me personally. Whose fault it is doesn’t matter in the least. What matters is that it’s happening.

Let’s look at some facts. The following is from the Inspector General’s Report on one of the better facilities located in Newark, New Jersey. These are their recommendations from February, 2019.

Recommendation: We recommend ICE conduct an immediate, full review of the Essex County Correctional Facility and the Essex County Department of Corrections’ management of the facility to ensure compliance with ICE’s 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards. As part of this assessment, ICE must review and ensure compliance with those standards addressing: 1. Unreported security incidents; 2. Food safety; and 3. Facility conditions that include ceiling leaks, unsanitary shower stalls, bedding, and outdoor recreation areas.

Those are the conclusions of the Department of Homeland Security, not the conclusions of liberals, democrats, or socialists.

Facilities in Texas are worse. “Many of them are sleeping on concrete floors, including infants, toddlers, preschoolers. They are being given nothing but instant meals, Kool-Aid and cookies — many of them are sick. We are hearing that many of them are not sleeping. Almost all of them are incredibly sad and being traumatized. Many of them have not been given a shower for weeks. Many of them are not being allowed to brush their teeth except for maybe once every 10 days. They have no access to soap. It’s incredibly unsanitary conditions, and we’re very worried about the children’s health.” –

A law professor who recently visited the facility, Warren Binford of Willamette University

These are children. They are no different from your son or daughter, or your niece or nephew, or you and your siblings. They cannot possibly be guilty of any crime.

If their parents didn’t want them in this situation, they should have stayed in their own countries. It’s the parents’ fault, not ours!

Again, I couldn’t care less about whose fault it is. It does nothing to excuse the atrocities of the way we are treating human beings. We’re kidnapping children from their parents’ arms. They can’t be traced later, so reunification is exceptionally difficult. The children are housed in areas intended for adults, and the overcrowding is such that children are sleeping on top of one another on cold cement floors.

“Gialluca and a slew of other lawyers have been meeting with children and young mothers at facilities across the state this month as pro bono attorneys. At the McAllen center, Gialluca said, everyone she spoke with said they sought out Border Patrol agents after crossing the Rio Grande so they could request asylum.
Gialluca said the migrants, all from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, told her they aren’t receiving proper medical care and children don’t have enough clean clothes. Unable to clean themselves, young mothers reported wiping their children’s runny noses or vomit with their own clothing, Gialluca said. There aren’t sufficient cups or baby bottles, so many are reused or shared.”


https://www.texastribune.org/2019/06/23/immigrant-detention-center-mcalllen-overcrowded-filthy-conditions/

These are not conditions under which any human being ought to be living. We are experiencing this crisis in this country at this moment. It needs to end. It needs to end now.

Okay, Mr. Bleeding Heart Liberal, how would YOU end it? We have borders for a reason, or do you think we should throw open the door and let everyone in? Is that what you do at your house, or do you lock the door every night?

First, in my Ideal World, we would be done with Us and Them. We would recognize that every single one of us is a human being. We would recognize that all human beings should be allowed to live some form of decent life, and that one’s country of origin does nothing to tell me if one is a good person or a bad person. Neither does one’s race, gender, religion, appearance, economic security, or political ideas. To determine if one is a good person, I need to observe that person’s behavior.

Well, their behavior was to break the laws of the United States. That makes them criminals, and they deserve NOTHING from us!

I’m afraid adherence to laws does nothing to tell me about a person’s value. Harriet Tubman, for more than a decade, was breaking the law by guiding people along the Underground Railroad. She was breaking the law. She was also doing the right thing.

If an immigrant does something to hurt someone – if an immigrant assaults someone, kills or rapes someone, or steals from someone – that’s a reason to remove him or her. But stepping across a line does nothing to hurt me. It does nothing to hurt you, either.

The arguments against immigrants are generally an effort to dehumanize them. How could you do this to a child? Well… if they’re not really children… if they’re not my children… then it’s okay to treat them badly because they, you know, deserve it somehow.

But I think, deep down, we all know that’s not true. We have to find a way to make this normal so we don’t have to feel appalled. And when this becomes normal, Death Camps aren’t far behind. And, it won’t be just immigrants. They’re first, but others will join them in coming days.

We’ve been doing this for centuries. We did it with black people. They were obviously different. Their skin was a darker color. They were Them. Good people, white people, were Us. We have to subjugate those who are not Us.

We did it with women. We did it with those whose sexual orientations were different from the majority. We did it with those whose religious beliefs were different from the majority.

Why?

Who is better off for deciding that one group of people needs to be treated better or worse based on their membership in that group?

I’m a straight, white male. That makes me better than absolutely no one. Your membership in whatever groups have been assigned to you makes you no better than anyone else, either.

You’re better or worse than other people based upon your behaviors.

The behaviors of these immigrant children don’t earn them the hell we are giving them.

I’m not a politician. There are many very good reasons for that. I don’t have solutions to America’s problems. But I can certainly recognize a problem when it’s staring me in the face. We are moving down a road we should all be able to recognize by now. Let’s stop where we are and turn around and go back.

Can we afford to give these people the help they need? I submit, if we want to call ourselves human, we can’t afford not to.

In my Ideal World, there are no borders. No, we don’t let strangers in our houses, but my house is not the same as my country. My home contains my private property, and a stranger inside it may represent a danger to me.

The country, however, is made up of nothing but strangers and immigrants. I’m perfectly content for them to find the best life they can here. In my world, everyone has shelter, food, medicine, and sanitary conditions in which to live. We all have a fair chance to make our lives better. We’re all willing to give each other a helping hand. We all get a good education, and we find joy in our lives.

Why is that world impossible? Because you’ve been taught it is.

Let’s learn something new. Let’s learn Love for All Humans. Let’s learn what a friend taught me when I was 16 years old: “One planet, one people… please?”

The Dilemma of Us vs. Them

I am human; so are all of you. At this point, everything else, sadly, becomes exclusionary.

I’m male. More than half of you are not.

I’m white. Again, more than half of you are not.

I’m straight. I don’t have the statistics but certainly many of you are not.

I’m an Atheist. The vast majority of you are not.

I’m more than half a century old. I’ve eliminated another large group of you.

I’m an American citizen, and we can break that category down even further. I’m also a Democrat, a Liberal, and a member of the Lower Class. There are even fewer of you left in my particular box.

So, my basic group of “Us” includes very few of the people I probably like most. I see no advantages to belonging to any groups beyond being human, if it means the exclusion of others.

What are the benefits of separating ourselves from others? Why would we do it? If there were no advantages, I feel sure no one would bother.

I’m not a sociologist. But, in the minuscule research I did, I found that sociologists believe that the advantage of associating with those who match our categories is that we advance in life by being around people that fit our labels. This can be our social class, our gender, the opposite gender, financial status, and any number of equally arbitrary, and, I believe, meaningless categories. And while I agree this is probably true from the sense of one’s career, it seems to me to limit one’s experiences unnecessarily.

Many of you fit few of the same labels I do. Does that mean that I can learn nothing from you? Does that mean we can’t understand one another? Does that make me worthless to you? I believe the answer to all those questions is No.

Your experiences have been distinctly different from mine. When I learn about them, I can understand you a little better. If I can understand you a little better, I can also understand all human beings just a little better. You’ve added to my experiences, and I learned something from you. And, finally, it helps me understand myself a little better.

We probably speak the same language. You can understand what I’m writing. There’s a good chance I can understand what you’re writing. We are very different in many ways, I’m sure. But we can communicate. And from that, we can reach the beginning of an understanding of one another.

If I am of no value to you, it’s a good guess you wouldn’t have read this far. We can have value to one another without ever meeting, or even speaking. I don’t know what my value to you may be, but your value to me is, if nothing else, that my thoughts are being considered by another consciousness. That’s an exhilarating feeling.

I’m not interested in excluding anyone from my life based on a category. If you’re an asshole, that’s one thing. But assholes show up in all categories. It’s not your category differences that bother me; it’s simply that you’re an asshole. I can learn from you anyway, but I probably don’t want to hang out with you.

Mozart was, I’m told, a complete asshole. The thing is, I don’t care. I love The Marriage of Figaro, regardless of the details of the personal life of the artist who created it. I just don’t want to have him over for dinner.

For all the ways that we are different, we’re almost certainly more similar. We’re not just all human. If you prick us, we all bleed. We all have hearts that beat. We all eat food. We all need water to live. We all go to the bathroom, or if not, excrete waste in some form or other. We all need oxygen. We’re all living on the same rock in space, all at the very same time. As far as we can tell, we are the only living beings in the universe. We have quite a bit in common.

We gain nothing of actual value by deciding We are good, and They are not. Intelligent decisions are made about individuals, not categories. If I wanted only to have people like me in my life, I would be limited to straight, atheistic, diabetic, old, mostly dead, Star Trek fans who think that Enterprise was better than it got credit for being, and all the post TNG movies are pure crap. I don’t believe I have a single reader left in my category. I’m doomed to solitude. What a bummer for me.

If, however, now that I live in an age of international communication, and in a deeply connected world, I can have a greater diversity of people in my life, and I can, I hope, learn from whatever it is that you share with me, or with the world in general, then my life is richer for the experience. Is that selfish? Yes, I suppose it is, but that’s the subject of another essay.

If we can agree to this simple proposition, I believe the world would be a better place:

There is no Them. We are all Us.


Imagine all the people sharing all the world,
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
I hope some day you’ll join us
And the world will be as one

John Lennon